From owner-cvs-all  Thu Apr  5  9:13:10 2001
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from ipcard.iptcom.net (ipcard.iptcom.net [212.9.224.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 431C137B423; Thu,  5 Apr 2001 09:13:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from vic.sabbo.net (dialup14-33.iptelecom.net.ua [212.9.229.97])
	by ipcard.iptcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA53359;
	Thu, 5 Apr 2001 19:12:58 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1])
	by vic.sabbo.net (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f35GCRt69709;
	Thu, 5 Apr 2001 19:12:27 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <3ACC996A.98218FBE@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 19:12:26 +0300
From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: Vega International Capital
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: uk,ru,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/dlmalloc Makefile 
 distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-message pkg-plist 
 ports/devel/dlmalloc/files Makefile README.FreeBSD
References: <22779.986485542@critter>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> In message <3ACC91AB.2A183123@FreeBSD.org>, Maxim Sobolev writes:
>
> >> >  Moreover, due to not very clear for me reasons Python benchmark (pybench)
> >> >  is about 60% (!!!) faster with this allocator comparing to the libc one.
> >> >  Obviously we should investigate this further and if there is no error
> >> >  then tune either Python or our own malloc.
> >>
> >> Did you measure this with the right malloc flags for the libc version ?
> >>
> >> Remember that -current runs with malloc flags "AJ" as default, that is not
> >> fair if it comes to performance comparisons (but it does wonders for finding
> >> bugs :-)
> >
> >I don't use default value:
> >
> >$ ls -l /etc/malloc.conf
> >lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  7 Jul 22  2000 /etc/malloc.conf@ -> HRajuxz
>
> I think you should use 'r' for performance comparisons...

Bah, you are as usually right, however even with this settings python+dlmalloc in
-current is about 10-12% faster (only 5% in -stable).

-Maxim


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message