From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 2 20:42:54 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58AF16A418; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 20:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [IPv6:2001:1b20:1:3::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4933913C4A3; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 20:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (vkbczg@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l72Kglsc047696; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:42:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l72Kglpk047695; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:42:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:42:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200708022042.l72Kglpk047695@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, dougb@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-current User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 02 Aug 2007 22:42:53 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: named.conf restored to hint zone for the root by default X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, dougb@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:42:54 -0000 Hi, Just for the record, I like the current solution, i.e. default being a "hint" zone, and slave zones being commented out, ready to be used for those who know what they're doing. However, I noticed that the "refresh" interval of the root zone is 1800, i.e. it would be fetched every 30 minutes, even though the zone seems to be updated at most once per day. Therefore, wouldn't it make sense to add the following option to the slave zones? min-refresh-time 86400; Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "Perl will consistently give you what you want, unless what you want is consistency." -- Larry Wall