From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Feb 20 13:22:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from yowie.cc.uq.edu.au (yowie.cc.uq.edu.au [130.102.2.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555E637B4EC for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:22:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from s337240@student.uq.edu.au) Received: from student.uq.edu.au (s337240@student.uq.edu.au [130.102.87.136]) by yowie.cc.uq.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA07115; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 07:21:21 +1000 (GMT+1000) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 07:21:20 +1000 (GMT+1000) From: Trent Waddington To: Rahul Siddharthan Cc: Kris Kennaway , Subject: Re: Stallman stalls again' In-Reply-To: <20010220220137.J38225@lpt.ens.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: > Actually, if you really want to get it into mainstream gcc, it seems > to me that RMS is the wrong guy to ask. Have you tried the gcc team? > http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html > I don't know whether they'll agree with RMS: I suspect not. > Thanks, I was asking RMS legal questions in particular whether I should go after the copyright assignment to the FSF when this ugliness began. For those who don't know, before anything will be included in gcc you have to assign your copyright to the FSF and obtain a letter of diclaimer from any employer you have at the time. Trent To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message