From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 19 21:00:45 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86A9C77F
 for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:00:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from col0-omc3-s17.col0.hotmail.com (col0-omc3-s17.col0.hotmail.com
 [65.55.34.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FEBCC7
 for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:00:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from COL127-W27 ([65.55.34.136]) by col0-omc3-s17.col0.hotmail.com
 with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); 
 Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:00:44 -0700
X-TMN: [yWASlkNhZcRx/40qH4rOqGEXQbMyiavR]
X-Originating-Email: [jorgeassembler1@outlook.com]
Message-ID: <COL127-W276A61C2965CC60C598EE6E87F0@phx.gbl>
From: Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos <jorgeassembler1@outlook.com>
To: "freebsd-chat@freebsd.org" <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
Subject: RE: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable?
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:44 +0300
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <44pplhc3mw.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
References: <COL127-W4961547B486570D01FA0EBE87F0@phx.gbl>,
 <COL127-W5DF5F825DDBDDA7556623E87F0@phx.gbl>, <44pplhc3mw.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Mar 2014 21:00:44.0466 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[4B5F0120:01CF43B6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
 <freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-chat>,
 <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
 <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:00:45 -0000



> From: freebsd-chat-local@be-well.ilk.org
> To: jorgeassembler1@outlook.com
> Subject: Re: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable?
> Date: Wed=2C 19 Mar 2014 16:52:39 -0400
> CC: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
>=20
> Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos <jorgeassembler1@outlook.com> writes:
>=20
> >> From: jorgeassembler1@outlook.com
> >> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
> >> Subject: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable?
> >> Date: Wed=2C 19 Mar 2014 18:27:03 +0300
> >>=20
> >> Is written in OpenBSD FAQ:"One important difference between OpenBSD
> >> and many other operating systems is the documentation. OpenBSD
> >> developers take great pride in the system man pages. The man pages
> >> are the authoritative source of OpenBSD documentation -- not this
> >> FAQ=2C not third-party independently maintained pages=2C not "HOWTO"s=
=2C
> >> etc. "
> >> To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable?=20
> >
> > because no one responds? 		 	   		 =20
>=20
> I see no reason to disagree with OpenBSD's FAQ answer.
> I would give the same answer for FreeBSD=2C=20
> although maybe not quite as strongly.
> _______________________________________________


You understand Portuguese of Brazil ?If no=2C the that made to understand? =
		 	   		  =