From owner-freebsd-bugs  Wed Jun 26 18:13:57 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA09954
          for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 26 Jun 1996 18:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mongoose.bostic.com (bostic@mongoose.BSDI.COM [205.230.230.129])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA09947;
          Wed, 26 Jun 1996 18:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bostic@localhost) by mongoose.bostic.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) id VAA13883; Wed, 26 Jun 1996 21:05:14 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 21:05:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Keith Bostic <bostic@bsdi.com>
Message-Id: <199606270105.VAA13883@mongoose.bostic.com>
To: mark@linus.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: New bug introduced with sed bugfix
Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org,
        gnats@freefall.freebsd.org, mckusick@McKusick.COM, plm@xs4all.nl,
        torek@bsdi.com
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Umm, that looks awfully like the same patch that was committed as revision
> 1.5... :-(  Try it with the test case in PR bin/1350.
>
> (I suspect you just forwarded the wrong diff here.)

The difference is that there's a *++p instead of a *p++.

Not that that makes any difference, you're right, the patch
is wrong.  *sigh*

I've patched it yet again, and run the regression tests as
well as the three test cases (one we had plus the two from
FreeBSD).  Once it's passed internal BSDI review, I'll send
it along.

--keith