From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 21 11:52:58 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DD610656C4
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:52:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBE98FC22
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:52:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-143-131.dynamic.qsc.de
	[92.195.143.131]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CFA1EAE8;
	Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:52:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id p0LBqsYS013712;
	Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:52:54 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:52:52 +0100
From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To: Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net>
Message-Id: <20110121125252.7c34abdc.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikeWyCd-e2UquhSFOtqnG4KJkucoSTm1vF_emMB@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimmRcO2HLaZQ1SX9kmeByi-6VhiqdZHmJvhhvmD@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimVtswTX1CijDKoBzGOpjS8QMvVdhYjGAPJJafU@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTiknV1P4bhgtmxW6FG+XysX76qV0ZgkdAzKJNQ8u@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikeWyCd-e2UquhSFOtqnG4KJkucoSTm1vF_emMB@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: EDVAX
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Ed Flecko <edflecko@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Should I use the standard-supfile or stable-supfile?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 11:52:58 -0000

On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:09:49 -0800, Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 15:42, Ed Flecko <edflecko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thank you Nerius!
> >
> > Would it be smart to run this daily via cron?
> 
> No, the errata branches are only updated once every couple months (on
> average) - that's overkill.

As an addition: It may be an option to switch to binary
updates (using the freebsd-update program) if you want
to track -RELEASE for GENERIC kernel anyway.


-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...