From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 16:41:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9298C16A417; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (grnl-static-02-0046.dsl.iowatelecom.net [69.66.56.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2456F13C465; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l09GSw0Q094402; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:28:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: (from brooks@localhost) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l09GSwO0094401; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:28:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:28:58 -0600 From: Brooks Davis To: Florent Thoumie Message-ID: <20070109162858.GA88663@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <45A2F08B.1010009@FreeBSD.org> <20070109020347.GB2599@mail.scottro.net> <45A37979.4060102@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45A37979.4060102@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Niclas Zeising , freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.org (experimental) ports moving to LOCALBASE soon X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:41:01 -0000 --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:16:09AM +0000, Florent Thoumie wrote: > Niclas Zeising wrote: > > On 1/9/07, Scott Robbins wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:31:55AM +0000, Florent Thoumie wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > >> > Now that most ports are X11BASE-clean, I'm going to move X.org ports= to > >> > ${LOCALBASE} (as opposed to ${X11BASE}, where they live now). So exp= ect > >> > a commit talking about X.org PREFIX in the next few days. > >> > > >> > Actually, I advise using git-whatchanged and git-log before you make > >> any > >> > upgrade of your installed ports. The prefix change should need a > >> > PORTREVISION bump but I won't do it (cause I'm too lazy), so you'll > >> have > >> > to type something like "portupgrade -R xorg\*". > >> > > >=20 > > [SNIP] > >=20 > >> > >> My own list--(it'd be great if other people give their opinions > >> too--SirDice, if you're reading this, it's a start at our xorg-lite) :) > >=20 > > Um, speaking of xorg-lite, I was thinking a bit about doing an > > option-based xorg install, where you can choose what to install at > > config-time via the ncurses-based framework. The options will > > propably mostly be related to drivers and maybe some apps in that > > case. The drawback is that we might get horrible Makefiles because of > > all options and so on... But anyway, what do you guys think? I'm not > > even sure if it's doable, it's just an idea. >=20 > I was thinking of writing a default set of dependencoes and giving the > opportunity to select the exact bits you want to install (like a USE > flag). Assuming there's like ~300 ports, I'm not sure to go the OPTIONS w= ay. If there are 300 ports, OPTIONS is absolutly not the way to go. The dialog on the ghostscript ports is an example of how much this sucks. -- Brooks --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFo8LJXY6L6fI4GtQRAiArAJ9TlW4WlVvTERE6qzhce6FpEBhabQCdFJC8 3Anfd4T3e3qYWXp+04dHeNc= =0IeG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--