From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sun Oct 24 22:32:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from staff.cs.usyd.edu.au (staff.cs.usyd.edu.au [129.78.8.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B52C14A0E for ; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 22:32:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mhenry@hons.cs.usyd.edu.au) Subject: Re: Need anti-exchange ammunition To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 15:32:03 +1000 (EST) From: "Michael Henry" In-Reply-To: <199910250357.NAA03173@nymph.detir.qld.gov.au> from "Stephen McKay" at Oct 25, 99 01:57:15 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 505 Message-Id: <19991025053211.8B52C14A0E@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > So, I'm looking for as much anti exchange ammunition as I can find. I'm > interested, of course, in technical stuff, but even more interested in > war stories of managers getting fired for breaking the mail system. And > it can't hurt to be directed to sites that describe how to build an > exchange replacement from open source tools, just to scare them with. Have they come up with any good arguments *for* replacing FreeBSD/Sendmail with Windows NT/Exchange? If so, I'd like to hear them. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message