From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 18:05:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381CD667 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:05:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ateve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3285DC6 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TynIR-00019e-LE; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:42:35 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TynI1-0005yo-Lm; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:42:09 +0000 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:41:52 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: bsd Subject: Re: Best approach to jails + zfs Message-Id: <20130125174152.385948bbc82410a3eecc4472@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <6951EF94-E2BD-4B03-9F42-EA94BD23B718@todoo.biz> References: <6951EF94-E2BD-4B03-9F42-EA94BD23B718@todoo.biz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) Cc: Liste FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:05:40 -0000 On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:25:06 +0100 bsd wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to have the point of view of the community on the best approach > in order to handle a quite large system with couple of jails (shouldn't > have more than 5 to 10). Whole system is based on zfs. I'll use this as a > backup server. You might like the sysutils/ezjail port - I use it for a very similar purpose and find it works well. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith