From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 15 10:54:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387EF106564A; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0578FC14; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5ED614E685D; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:54:50 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Z5AsfjHb8efj; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:54:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [152.66.150.80] (dhcp-80.e.wlan.bme.hu [152.66.150.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6AE414E67D2; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:54:48 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4EE9D1FB.4030003@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:54:51 +0100 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ryan Steinmetz References: <6490f693-b019-4260-99d4-4f2dc4d1b8ab@blur> <18a96a03-b593-4431-95bf-70b4a08f6e01@blur> <20111214204423.GA5725@fast.rit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20111214204423.GA5725@fast.rit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Scheidell , Wesley Shields , "cvs-all@FreeBSD.org" , "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" , Michael Scheidell , "cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:54:53 -0000 Em 14-12-2011 21:44, Ryan Steinmetz escreveu: > It would also be appreciated to ping the maintainer letting them know > that you plan to make commits to their port. If you don't hear anything > back within a couple days (and it's in a maintainer timeout state), then > proceed. > > I had reviewed this PR and had been investigating a solution. If you > had reached out, I would have been able to share this with you. I'm sorry, I just looked at the PR backlog and the patch that Michael sent me, I haven't noticed that you took maintainership in the meantime. Otherwise, I'd have asked Michael to discuss this change with you. I should have been more careful with this. On the other hand, I'd like add that you should have taken the PRs when you took maintainership. Leaving PRs in an inconsistent state is confusing and being a maintainer also includes the responsibility of monitoring and answering update and change request and not just exercising authority over the port. I'm sure your intentions are good and your decisions are reasonable but if you don't even have time to answer PRs in a reasonable time, you should rethink if you are able to deal with more ports when you take maintainership. Gabor