From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 10 3: 3:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from lion.butya.kz (butya-gw.butya.kz [194.87.112.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8794214C49 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 03:03:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bp@butya.kz) Received: from bp (helo=localhost) by lion.butya.kz with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11PNSG-0002x9-00; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:58:52 +0700 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:58:52 +0700 (ALMST) From: Boris Popov To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: Daniel O'Connor , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NetWare client in -current In-Reply-To: <19990910122431.B99718@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Is there any reason to not have it as a port? > > > IMHO, only the basic IPX/SPX functionality should be included into the > source tree. Anything else could be available as ports/net/nw-utils. An IPX/SPX stack is already in the tree and past year made it more or less functional. -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message