From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Jul 31 1: 8:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECA137B400 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 01:08:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [193.162.142.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24D343E31 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 01:08:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.droso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D3C5BC2; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:08:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0C1DD5BAD; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:08:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:08:35 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: Matthias Buelow Cc: Peter Pentchev , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/41012: /etc/periodic/daily/440.status-mailq assumes sendmail Message-ID: <20020731100834.C17892@droso.net> References: <200207290740.g6T7e31g091006@freefall.freebsd.org> <3D454B81.2050405@mukappabeta.de> <20020730071817.GC2549@straylight.oblivion.bg> <3D46A85A.8090609@mukappabeta.net> <20020730150710.GA382@straylight.oblivion.bg> <3D46B2DD.6070809@mukappabeta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3D46B2DD.6070809@mukappabeta.de>; from mkb@mukappabeta.de on Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 05:38:05PM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 4.6-STABLE X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 05:38:05PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote: > option... JFYI. After I found out about periodic.conf (actually > I have to admit I didn't know about it when I sent the PR) and that > the problematic check can be switched off with it, the PR could > be closed... would be nice, tho, if the blahblah_submit_mailq thing > would be "NO" by default or the postfix port issue a message upon > installation to inform one where to look for necessary changes > (something like "have a look at periodic.conf for sendmail-specific > mailq checks" would be ok.) >=20 Which is exactly what the postfix port does. Have a look at /usr/ports/mail/postfix/pkg-message I'm not sure about other MTAs. Cheers, -erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing -- http://droso.org --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9R5sCqy9aWxUlaZARAhkMAKCKyDqVguTnFPhDylNM8kZMd6071gCeKhV8 iuOnkJWUj+wlDqIEIlw8EGY= =25qe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message