From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 6 22:19:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B58106564A for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 22:19:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE838FC14 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 22:19:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m56M1N9D082277; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:01:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m56M1NDp082276; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:01:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:01:23 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Peter Wemm Message-ID: <20080606220123.GC82082@dragon.NUXI.org> Mail-Followup-To: obrien@freebsd.org, Peter Wemm , Ian FREISLICH , current@freebsd.org References: <20080606155541.GA90949@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: Ian FREISLICH , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone else seeing this (cvs wierdness)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:19:32 -0000 On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:24:40AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > Many places in the source tree were affected by clowns using 'cvs > import -ko' in spite of it being removed from the instructions in 1997 > and no longer being part of standard procedure. Ports is badly > affected by -ko at this point. The CVS meisers can fix this with 'cvs admin'. :-) -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting"