From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 14 22:03:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6810A16A407; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (static-151-204-231-237.bos.east.verizon.net [151.204.231.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E693D43D5E; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:03:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com (mx-broadway [38.98.68.18]) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAEM3ih3005223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:03:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: Erwin Lansing Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:03:37 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200611142154.kAELsKN4007777@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200611142154.kAELsKN4007777@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611141703.38311.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/2193/Tue Nov 14 09:03:11 2006 on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, mi@aldan.algebra.com Subject: Re: bin/34628: [pkg_install] [patch] pkg-routines ignore the recorded md5 checksums X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:03:50 -0000 в╕второк 14 листопад 2006 16:54, Erwin Lansing написав: > Synopsis: [pkg_install] [patch] pkg-routines ignore the recorded md5 > checksums > I agree with sobomax that this functionality is not needed > and adds unnecessary overhead. No ports should ever install > the same file, that's what CONFLICTS are for, and there > should never be installed multiple versions of the same port. That's a surprisingly naive way of thinking... The CONFLICTS functionality is broken on occasion in bsd.port.mk, and not every port sets it anyway... `pkg_info -W' would also be able to warn about checksum mismatches, which would suggest, a file has been modified (or corrupted) since getting installed. Anyway, what is the overhead exactly? -mi > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=34628