From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 31 00:43:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8811065680 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nealhogan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30AF8FC12 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywt32 with SMTP id 32so7109255ywt.13 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 17:43:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z6X5w6xyl0uDr+FzWO0VtgTIM6F8j+yzDCpH1kVJz3k=; b=PSpxPuNow5xFFuRJwnChi5dXRVYVUE3JdIgq9qyqxUtXx6zByWp+BchfhBaSCeeoBB wmyO7xwrh82R4Rpu233IAa+YL9D/Y2HxmoYIor+5ghPZP2mb6KDc/xxcKXbCZiopnzGJ sqPtR7GdEgZMMkq3klI5H8eb2IuMwdhlRPMYs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.192.132 with SMTP id i4mr14142246yhn.80.1320020438081; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 17:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.110.172 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 17:20:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 19:20:38 -0500 Message-ID: From: Neal Hogan To: Zantgo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: The ports are really funcional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:43:37 -0000 ummmm . . . this person has been doing similar "hold-my-hand-I-do-not-want-to-take-the-time" kinda thing on the oBSD lists recently. On 10/30/11, Zantgo wrote: > El 30-10-2011, a las 19:55, Warren Block escribi=F3: > >> On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote: >> >>> What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost >>> no one serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I tried also >>> install KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have been many errors, commonly >>> solocionables, for example I had to modify "REFRESH" to "true", but als= o >>> to get out other errors, commonly have a solution, but is a great probl= em >>> to have to spend all his time fixing bugs. Please tell me if it is >>> natural to every time I download large modifying ports so, if so, then >>> why say "functional"? >> >> Yes, ports work well. From the description, it's difficult to tell what >> is causing the problem. Please supply additional information, like what >> version of FreeBSD and the exact output of one of the errors (script(1) = is >> useful for that). Also see the section in the Handbook about packages a= nd >> ports: >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports.html >> >> Translations of the Handbook can be found at >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/doc/ in the books subdirectory. > > the problem is not the problem, since most are solving the problem is tha= t > there are many errors and problems, then as I say it is stable and > functional?_______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >