From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 08:59:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED5116A468 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru) Received: from pobox.codelabs.ru (pobox.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12EAE13C484 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=one; d=codelabs.ru; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:Sender:X-Spam-Status:Subject; b=mvMtlLXxMmeKqh4iIZWV2VP6V+VvbAxuhnfRwRJ9TWsCBl46nwgmHKB5qc9sk838ggtF6CqMAIub6skNRCv3b9PKVuoAJoS4ka5/NnuyyZbVg87m+vR1k7yE6zWcRz4443M/Dw0j1HynZjArN+FTk2Swq0ChJmlzc1rJhLbU0F4=; Received: from void.codelabs.ru (void.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.25]) by pobox.codelabs.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1I1IW8-0008gn-4e; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:59:52 +0400 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:59:46 +0400 From: Eygene Ryabinkin To: Nate Lawson Message-ID: <20070621085946.GI26920@void.codelabs.ru> References: <200706160347.33331.max@love2party.net> <20070617094126.GT3779@void.codelabs.ru> <200706171717.21585.max@love2party.net> <20070619074150.GC26920@void.codelabs.ru> <4677FF00.4060506@root.org> <20070620152609.GD26920@void.codelabs.ru> <4679659D.7050506@root.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4679659D.7050506@root.org> Sender: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf 4.1 Update available for testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:59:55 -0000 Nate, good day. Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:36:29AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > > Fine, thanks! So, you're happy with the way the problem was fixed? > > I see that another function that uses tbr_callout is tbr_timeout, > > but it will not be called before tbr_set. So it seems to me that > > callout initialisation only in tbr_set is enough. But maybe I am > > missing something? > > > > Thank you. > > If you want to trigger the call to callout_init() differently, you could > use a SYSINIT that runs before all of altq. Then you would be sure it's > always initialized before anything else can run. Good alternative. I will try it, thank you! -- Eygene