From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 15 00:54:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CB916A41A for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:54:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cedric@berger.to) Received: from smtp1.berger.to (ipc-99.berger.to [193.58.255.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF35F13C46A for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:54:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cedric@berger.to) Received: from imac.local (unknown [192.168.6.100]) by smtp1.berger.to (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E221C9D; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:44:21 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47B4E2B3.8050305@berger.to> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:54:11 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Berger?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lewis References: <20080214171132.GA86128@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <47B498E7.2070304@berger.to> <20080214203957.GA88039@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20080214203957.GA88039@misty.eyesbeyond.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: JDK 1.6.0 patchset 4 "Mach 1" X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:54:23 -0000 Greg Lewis wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:39:19PM +0100, C?dric Berger wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> Thanks a lot for the fantastic work you guys are doing! >> >> Just one question: >> >>> On behalf of the BSD Java Porting team, I'm pleased to announce the >>> availability of Patchset 4 "Mach 1" for JDK 1.6, based on the >>> JDK 1.6.0 Update 3 JRL source code. >> Is that really based on JDK Update 3? Why not Update 4? > > Because the source code for Update 4 is not yet released. Its my > understanding that it will be sometime next week, but Landon's excellent > MacOS X had already waited long enough and I wanted to get it (and > other features like NetBSD/amd64 support) out before the tree potentially > destabilised due to Update 4 and FreeBSD/sparc64 hitting it. > > Believe me, we would have loved to based this on Update 4, but it simply > wasn't a possibility without further delays. Ok, thanks a lot for the info. Cedric