From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 15:31:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B6F106566C; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:31:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu) Received: from localmailD.acsu.buffalo.edu (localmailD.acsu.buffalo.edu [128.205.5.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BA28FC08; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localmailD.acsu.buffalo.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 39968C1808; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:15:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localmailD.acsu.buffalo.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localmailD.acsu.buffalo.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A77E4F6; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:15:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mweb2.acsu.buffalo.edu (mweb2.acsu.buffalo.edu [128.205.5.239]) by localmailD.acsu.buffalo.edu (Prefixe) with ESMTP id 8A3D0C1808; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:15:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [128.205.32.76] (bauer.cse.buffalo.edu [128.205.32.76]) by mweb2.acsu.buffalo.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8D0207C0; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:15:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Ken Smith To: Alexey Dokuchaev In-Reply-To: <20090918150730.GA18347@FreeBSD.org> References: <200909181453.n8IEr1xJ093865@svn.freebsd.org> <20090918150730.GA18347@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-l9V1gu2tR7qUD3jdT/LG" Organization: U. Buffalo CSE Department Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:15:44 -0400 Message-Id: <1253286944.18414.7.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-PM-EL-Spam-Prob: : 8% Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, Ken Smith Subject: Re: svn commit: r197313 - head/release X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:31:27 -0000 --=-l9V1gu2tR7qUD3jdT/LG Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 15:07 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > I've always been wondering how could docs be more important than livefs? > I'd rather have -docs iso (which I won't ever download anyways) than > -livefs one (which is needed far more often, e.g. to fix botched or > corrupted installation) in addition to disc1. [ Sorry, a bit distracted testing RC1 stuff right now so I forgot to add to the first reply ... ] I also tested dropping SEPARATE_LIVEFS from both amd64 and i386 earlier in the release cycle just to see if that was even an option and it was not. Without SEPARATE_LIVEFS the disc1 iso image overflowed our target size even with no packages on it. --=20 Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | --=-l9V1gu2tR7qUD3jdT/LG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkqzpCAACgkQ/G14VSmup/ZlLQCeNIlTqkEe/cgJbEX8oeXdsaff PAAAoIXMSTqJx0+dtctvbEXzu4CPhwk+ =FLpC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-l9V1gu2tR7qUD3jdT/LG--