From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 19 13:44:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629FF16A4CE for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 13:44:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200AF43DAA for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 13:44:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from clk01a ([66.130.198.54]) by VL-MO-MR011.ip.videotron.ca (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IGQ000OEOTFCE@VL-MO-MR011.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 09:44:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 09:44:02 -0400 From: Nicolas Blais In-reply-to: To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-id: <200505190944.03008.nb_root@videotron.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200505172132.42322.nb_root@videotron.ca> <200505181829.47003.nb_root@videotron.ca> Subject: Re: sk interface (Marvell 88E8001) sluggish? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 13:44:26 -0000 On May 19, 2005 05:37 am, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > thanks. None of the open source drivers I know seem to know that rev. > 0x9 at this time. Really looks strange. Also I could only find > references of that with A8V baords. > > The two postings on Free/NetBSD lists talking about autnoeg/speed > problems. Could you check this? > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/2004-October/002215.html > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-amd64/2005/04/17/0004.html Thanks for the links, it seems many are having the problem across different MB (which are all Asus) on all BSDs. I also found that forcing speed instead of letting ifconfig on auto fixes part of the problem. In fact: clk01a# ifconfig -m sk0 sk0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.1.100 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet6 fe80::211:d8ff:fe44:15f4%sk0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 ether 00:11:d8:44:15:f4 media: Ethernet 100baseTX (100baseTX ) status: active supported media: media autoselect media 1000baseTX mediaopt full-duplex media 1000baseTX media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex media 100baseTX media 10baseT/UTP mediaopt full-duplex media 10baseT/UTP forcing it on 100baseTX (full duplex) : ifconfig sk0 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex And I get no more delays before connection, speed is about 93%(RX) and 63%(TX). which is a great improvement. >From DSLReport. Your download speed : 6162099 bps, or 6017 kbps. A 752.2 KB/sec transfer rate. Your upload speed : 511465 bps, or 499 kbps. This is a start and I suggest that everyone with a sk0 and that problem try forcing it on 100mbps and do some test. I don't want to be just lucky :). Thanks, Nicolas.