From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 22 00:00:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB8A1065672 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:00:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62FE8FC19 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBA050994 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:00:26 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from nyi.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nyi.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ju-KyoELrwJO for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:00:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-auth.unixathome.org (smtp-auth.unixathome.org [10.4.7.7]) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D12B509D0 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:00:26 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4B087F15.4050508@langille.org> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:00:21 -0500 From: Dan Langille User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: net/cvsup-mirror X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:00:28 -0000 I think there's a bug in net/cvsup-mirror/cvsupd.sh.in I think we need to add these lines to the file: command_args="-e -C ${maxclients:-8} -l @${facility:-daemon} \ -b ${base:-/home/ncvs} ${cvsupd_flags} -s sup.client" ... just before this line: stop_cmd="cvsupd_stop" Why? I just installed the port. When i start it from the command line, it stays in the forground. It goes away after the first connection terminates. With the line, the port behaves as normal. Anyone concur?