From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 10 20:35:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F51A16A4CE; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:35:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.eecs.harvard.edu (bowser.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF51943D4C; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:34:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ellard@eecs.harvard.edu) Received: from localhost (localhost.eecs.harvard.edu [127.0.0.1]) by mail.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E5B54C791; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:34:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.eecs.harvard.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bowser.eecs.harvard.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81391-03; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:34:58 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 465) id 5D65054C7FD; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:34:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EE354C7FC; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:34:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:34:58 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Ellard To: Jeremie Le Hen In-Reply-To: <20050310113843.GJ34822@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Message-ID: <20050310153251.J73108@bowser.eecs.harvard.edu> References: <200503091838.06322.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <20050310113843.GJ34822@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at eecs.harvard.edu cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG cc: David Schultz cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: the current status of nullfs, unionfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:35:00 -0000 On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > A little time ago, phk@ asked for people to submit regression tests for > virtual filesystem like this [1]. AFAIK, nobody submitted even one test > so far. This could be a good starting point to have unionfs work > correctly again. However, I think FreeBSD VFS gurus should first spread > some ideas and clues about tests to do. I guess indeed there are very > tricky ones that most common mortals wouldn't even suspect. I know that Kirk McKusick has a stress test he uses for his own stuff (in case you don't already know about it). -Dan