From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 7 17:45:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DBF816A403; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022EE13C468; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [88.66.15.55] (helo=amd64.laiers.local) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu5) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML25U-1HaEz216wn-00041r; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 19:45:53 +0200 From: Max Laier Organization: FreeBSD To: Nate Lawson Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 18:45:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <4617D3A6.8000201@root.org> In-Reply-To: <4617D3A6.8000201@root.org> X-Face: ,,8R(x[kmU]tKN@>gtH1yQE4aslGdu+2]; R]*pL,U>^H?)gW@49@wdJ`H<=?utf-8?q?=25=7D*=5FBD=0A=09U=5For=3D=5CmOZf764=26nYj=3DJYbR1PW0ud?=>|!~,,CPC.1-D$FG@0h3#'5"k{V]a~.<=?utf-8?q?mZ=7D44=23Se=7Em=0A=09Fe=7E=5C=5DX5B=5D=5Fxj?=(ykz9QKMw_l0C2AQ]}Ym8)fU MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1565023.8ZCeSOeJC0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200704071945.51273.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/1YiwzCRzP+ZrVGiJsPrszH9lpFNABSPhr8kV 0O+RyL5r32AMydwgk4FDSVikuIS8x3KPreJr91Mxx5QXm44oui 0ldj46Y7HJSC/isqGPE2A== Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: call for testers: altq in current X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:45:55 -0000 --nextPart1565023.8ZCeSOeJC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 07 April 2007 19:23, Nate Lawson wrote: > A few weeks ago, I committed a change to ALTQ that I was only able to > compile-test. What I need is someone with a laptop or other > cpufreq-capable system that is also using ALTQ to verify that with > powerd running, the queuing timing is now reliable. > > Previously, altq would just cache the first value of the CPU freq it > saw (based on tsc_freq) and use that forever. Now it gets updated each > time the freq changes. I want to make sure the edge cases (i.e., freq > changes while a packet is being timed) work ok. I will try to give it a spin over the long weekend. Other testers please=20 note that you should test this without ALTQ_NOPCC. Looking at the patch=20 now, it seems that the eventhandler should take this into account, too. =20 i.e. when ALTQ_NOPCC is defined we emulate a 256Mhz clock with=20 microtime - this shouldn't be dependent on the real cpu frequency=20 (eventhough things will get strange when the clockspeed drops below=20 256Mhz). Sorry for not paying attention when you posted the patch. CC'ing freebsd-pf@ ... laptop anyone? =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1565023.8ZCeSOeJC0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGF9jPXyyEoT62BG0RAnBVAJ9KQwEuN07YBg5Y7SrNE4vNRXInawCdGRvw 5vPp/cN26WMz2BSlk9qJx7g= =amR7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1565023.8ZCeSOeJC0--