From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 17:06:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21F516A492 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:06:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp7-g19.free.fr (smtp7-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A28B13C468 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:06:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org (unknown [82.233.2.192]) by smtp7-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045495609; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:06:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BA711AB0; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:06:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xbsd.org Received: from smtp.xbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv1.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qSzw9wuvRnFK; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:05:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from [193.95.134.156] (mayday.esat.net [193.95.134.156]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F52F11AA9; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:05:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45A3CB6B.9060703@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:05:47 +0000 From: Florent Thoumie User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061121) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brooks Davis References: <45A2F08B.1010009@FreeBSD.org> <20070109020347.GB2599@mail.scottro.net> <45A37979.4060102@FreeBSD.org> <20070109162858.GA88663@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <20070109162858.GA88663@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigCFD3F99EAC98F6B1164FCADF" Cc: Niclas Zeising , freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.org (experimental) ports moving to LOCALBASE soon X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:06:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigCFD3F99EAC98F6B1164FCADF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brooks Davis wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:16:09AM +0000, Florent Thoumie wrote: >> Niclas Zeising wrote: >>> On 1/9/07, Scott Robbins wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:31:55AM +0000, Florent Thoumie wrote: >>>> >>>>> Now that most ports are X11BASE-clean, I'm going to move X.org port= s to >>>>> ${LOCALBASE} (as opposed to ${X11BASE}, where they live now). So ex= pect >>>>> a commit talking about X.org PREFIX in the next few days. >>>>> >>>>> Actually, I advise using git-whatchanged and git-log before you mak= e >>>> any >>>>> upgrade of your installed ports. The prefix change should need a >>>>> PORTREVISION bump but I won't do it (cause I'm too lazy), so you'll= >>>> have >>>>> to type something like "portupgrade -R xorg\*". >>>>> >>> [SNIP] >>> >>>> My own list--(it'd be great if other people give their opinions >>>> too--SirDice, if you're reading this, it's a start at our xorg-lite)= :) >>> Um, speaking of xorg-lite, I was thinking a bit about doing an >>> option-based xorg install, where you can choose what to install at >>> config-time via the ncurses-based framework. The options will >>> propably mostly be related to drivers and maybe some apps in that >>> case. The drawback is that we might get horrible Makefiles because o= f >>> all options and so on... But anyway, what do you guys think? I'm no= t >>> even sure if it's doable, it's just an idea. >> I was thinking of writing a default set of dependencoes and giving the= >> opportunity to select the exact bits you want to install (like a USE >> flag). Assuming there's like ~300 ports, I'm not sure to go the OPTION= S way. >=20 > If there are 300 ports, OPTIONS is absolutly not the way to go. The > dialog on the ghostscript ports is an example of how much this sucks. Actually, it will probably be per-metaport, so it's more in the likes of 50/60 selectable entries (which still is a no-no). --=20 Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer --------------enigCFD3F99EAC98F6B1164FCADF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFo8tyMxEkbVFH3PQRCojxAJ0c9Rbfs2FNBpvG95Mo3OHfFLE4NQCfSWei 0CiPO9Pdys02RMclPil5XNE= =Jov7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCFD3F99EAC98F6B1164FCADF--