From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 21 00:17:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B66C6919 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 00:17:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.scaleengine.net (beauharnois2.bhs1.scaleengine.net [142.4.218.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8CE1CA for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 00:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (Seawolf.HML3.ScaleEngine.net [209.51.186.28]) (Authenticated sender: allanjude.freebsd@scaleengine.com) by mx1.scaleengine.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBE7A9E54F for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 00:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <550CB8C8.2010808@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 20:18:16 -0400 From: Allan Jude User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zpool(8) says hot spares work References: <20150318161345.GA5073@mail.michaelwlucas.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v7rV77WSpUxEunaAU6DjaPs9cVSkxCorL" X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 00:17:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --v7rV77WSpUxEunaAU6DjaPs9cVSkxCorL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2015-03-20 18:16, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, Michael W. Lucas wrote: >=20 >> Hi, >> >> It would be nice if zpool(8) said that hot spares don't work. >> >> This is a page synced from upstream, but other ZFS man pages contain >> FreeBSD-specific notes about missing functionality. >> >> Or is there some reason it shouldn't? Is this worth a PR? >=20 > There is a CAVEATS section that mentions this issue ... but it's all th= e > way at the end of a long page. >=20 > I cannot comment about the reasonableness of a more intrusive patch > without doing research for which I do not have time at the moment. >=20 > -Ben > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 I've wondered about the ZFS man pages for a while. There are some changes I can see that would be useful upstream, but also some that are specific to FreeBSD and/or the interaction between ZFS and FreeBSD. Obviously these man pages have some local modifications already, for things like the 'jailed' property. What is the proper procedure for making local changes, and how do we sync with upstream? --=20 Allan Jude --v7rV77WSpUxEunaAU6DjaPs9cVSkxCorL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVDLjLAAoJEJrBFpNRJZKf3/IP/0vPO9E1W/ayMujR0eFAk/A7 KVN0dAkxNyCPRQU3zyi7x4OHuyfw6dG+zx4KNCJ3iwgjqDVE17xcdRNdNi1/4cKx RdDy00zAamtaCICFF4Z00EtEerxN9AFg8kGId0PXsxi3XLCDwLCzMQ9dnDXyTa8m et7rM3KDBxWb1RHQ4BfxXCyOM+T2J56KGX/4cszyxJbmwjNT3OjPYUUfyHYTVU65 p7fN0CLexXpK6WytJPj7+Z8veClvtYBGLDazk0YhsH89iXoShw74MeB1xSzXz+1s OWHUu2Nvskc0SCMHk+nM9uPqgYz8EKs4a2sCruobVUX5fOzBYs6nsSNomwf1YFjm Hf5dxXh75CP2HbVlsrWosWWzqi4Kqttq/beF6bhZiURBW09Z01Mvp7PY1peQGmiZ oYH6QDa7OHEeMUacQR7Es8Sdly6D3UXjD8Ra3S+0eRa1df0QDO7L/fTJCmD4oPRH nUCTwonEv9BKAIQeQr+Zp6hrNIkAz8GyPPWiIdkizEfAINmo2ocn2BfR7xuBdE8r niE5qS5BRuSb0kT+EJ4LxzbbFx+LMyomqybiQfGuR9XqYP8KbU93G4JZS/+ZXP0p 5E/+jvzQNgpEnsOOgxaxuaibLriREnvKDWBBFo6GTTe3CBu3+Fh+B+rH7Iky1Pvn y1FsnhPezyl+AfprExfR =4+5C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v7rV77WSpUxEunaAU6DjaPs9cVSkxCorL--