From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jan 18 8:24:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6CC37B416; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:24:08 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g0IGNPv67103; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 18:23:25 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 18:23:25 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: "Bruce A. Mah" Cc: Nevermind , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, qa@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: we should note "maxusers 0" in UPDATING Message-ID: <20020118182325.B60750@sunbay.com> References: <20020118151109.GA35506@nevermind.kiev.ua> <200201181557.g0IFvbi44263@bmah.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200201181557.g0IFvbi44263@bmah.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 07:57:37AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Nevermind wrote: > > > I suppose we should note that using in kernel "maxusers 0" > > is now default and recomended setting now. > > UPDATING is for issues that could potentially cause a system to break > during an upgrade. This isn't one of them. > I agree. Let's not make UPDATING another relnotes copy. :-) > PS. It *is* noted in the release notes however, as well as tuning(7). > But you probably knew that already. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message