From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 7 00:55:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2759E106566C for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 00:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DAB8FC13 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 00:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m570tR4K086161; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:55:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m570tRFB086160; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:55:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:55:27 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Peter Wemm Message-ID: <20080607005527.GA85951@dragon.NUXI.org> Mail-Followup-To: obrien@freebsd.org, Peter Wemm , Ian FREISLICH , current@freebsd.org References: <20080606155541.GA90949@hub.freebsd.org> <20080606215832.GA82082@dragon.NUXI.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: Ian FREISLICH , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone else seeing this (cvs wierdness)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 00:55:30 -0000 On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 04:12:08PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:58 PM, David O'Brien wrote: > > Talk to the CVS developers (and read the bug report trail that lead to > > this change). This behavior is intended. I'm not saying I care for it, > > but its not a bug. > > It is a bug. The old working behavior is what we've come to depend on > and there is no replacement for the 'reset sticky tags and dates' mode > that we *need*. So /usr/bin/cvs should be just we we need for FreeBSD? Weren't you saying we shouldn't have a custom SVN client for FreeBSD use? Folks should use the "update -A" when they *need* to, not just out of habit as a default argument if no -r or -D. If you have ideas how to future relax the checks and not break semantics, please let me know. I've dealt with a use case Kris reported to me, and the one you reported to me. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)