From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 10 9:43: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles529.castles.com [208.214.165.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF23715E7E for ; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 09:43:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA02973; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 09:36:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199909101636.JAA02973@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Boris Popov Cc: "Daniel O'Connor" , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NetWare client in -current In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:51:36 +0700." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 09:36:10 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > > Is there any reason to not have it as a port? > > > > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be mount_nwfs > > because building it without the kernel source could be a problem, but the rest > > of it could be a port I think :) > > Yes, that's acceptable. But mount_nwfs require libncp.so and this > means that ncp library sources will be also required. So KLD, mount_nwfs > and libncp should go into source tree and other utilities can be a port. You could still build the KLD as a port, actually. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message