From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Mar 28 08:32:27 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA18975
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 08:32:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA18970
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 08:32:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id JAA03392; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 09:17:27 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199703281617.JAA03392@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Java binary support in FreeBSD ...
To: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 09:17:27 -0700 (MST)
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199703281113.FAA02883@bonkers.taronga.com> from "Peter da Silva" at Mar 28, 97 05:13:39 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> In article <Mutt.19970301123124.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> you write:
> >Geeze, why didn't they implement a ``script is on fd 0'' feature.
> 
> Good idea, but how about making it fd3 so you can still use it as a filter?

I thought there was "script on /proc/..." already.  8-|.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.