From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 01:01:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA20C16A4CE; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 01:01:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5B843D2F; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 01:01:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AySIf-000699-I4; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:04:21 +0600 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2391u2a055338; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:01:56 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2391upB055322; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:01:56 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:01:56 +0600 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040303090156.GA54273@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20040302153831.GK13724@sirius.firepipe.net> <200403021553.i22Frvhr030302@green.homeunix.org> <20040302161147.GK27008@FreeBSD.org> <20040303060924.GA37692@regency.nsu.ru> <20040303081525.GA92980@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040303081525.GA92980@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/arts Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 09:01:58 -0000 On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:15:25AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:09:25PM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > As it's been said, real time priority is needed only when one stresses > > their box with some disk I/O-intensive operation, e.g. extracting > > mozilla tarboll. Otherwise, its impact is negligible. On the other > > hand, disk activity might be an issue only is you have bunch of services > > running (http/ftp/cvsup/etc) on the same box you run your desktop. > > Since vast majority of desktop users does only run their desktop > > environment software without any server-type services, disk-intensive > > operations are pretty rare. I doubt that our typical [desktop] user > > extracts mozilla or X on a regular basis, > > Not true. If I build any large port on my desktop (no (http/ftp/cvsup > daemons), I can't hardly type due to Giant and the IRQ my SCSI controller > uses. (I feel like I'm using Linux. :-( ) > > Until we get something done about Giant disk activity has a larger impact > on the system than it should. Agreed. The impact heavy disk activity has on system smoothness is probably one of the top things that annoys me under FreeBSD. ./danfe