From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 13 21:33:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4632116A4CE; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:33:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDA143D2D; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:33:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j2DLXt7c014689; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:33:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id j2DLXoL3014688; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:33:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:33:50 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: "David O'Brien" Message-ID: <20050313223350.J55534@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <20050312062214.GH10159@hex.databits.net> <20050312181935.A90975@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20050313211440.GB1470@dragon.NUXI.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20050313211440.GB1470@dragon.NUXI.org>; from obrien@freebsd.org on Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 01:14:40PM -0800 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-6; AVE: 6.30.0.5; VDF: 6.30.0.26; host: newtrinity.zeist.de) cc: re@freebsd.org cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blade 100 w/ 5.4-PRERELEASE console X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:33:58 -0000 On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 01:14:40PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 06:19:35PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 12:22:14AM -0600, Will Andrews wrote: > > > mess with the OBP variables. I believe this is needless pain for > > > users trying to install FreeBSD on their Blade 100s (and possibly > > > other models). > > > > No, this is a nit which easily can be worked around. A real pain is > > that binutils are broken on sparc64 and users have to manually apply > > a patch to the base src and recompile binutils in order to be able > > to build a number of ports. > > Applying a patch that is running work around is a nit which can be easily > worked around. NOT being able to boot to apply a patch isn't. > I don't get what you try to say with the first sentence but the work-around to be able to boot was to set both input-device and output-device to ttya. I suggested you to do just this three times.