From owner-freebsd-security Thu Jun 4 06:14:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA04096 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 06:14:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from homeport.org (lighthouse.homeport.org [205.136.65.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA04084 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 06:14:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from adam@homeport.org) Received: (adam@localhost) by homeport.org (8.8.5/8.6.9) id JAA14669; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 09:08:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Adam Shostack Message-Id: <199806041308.JAA14669@homeport.org> Subject: Re: MD5 v. DES? In-Reply-To: <199806031852.SAA25260@paranoid.eltex.spb.ru> from "ark@eltex.spb.ru" at "Jun 3, 98 06:52:58 pm" To: ark@eltex.spb.ru Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 09:08:40 -0400 (EDT) Cc: adam@homeport.org, cschuber@uumail.gov.bc.ca, robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org, phk@critter.freebsd.dk, eivind@yes.no, sysadmin@mfn.org, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL27 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ark@eltex.spb.ru wrote: | Adam Shostack said : | | > TIS wrote one of these that isn't bad as long as you don't let the | > protocol cross the network. It was part of the firewall toolkit. | > Since a number of vendors support that, it would be nice to be | > compatible with it. | | Hmm, there are other clients/servers (except TIS and ssh) that do | support authsrv protocol? I've never seen any. Some of the handheld vendors support it. I know the cryptocard people have a plug in, and recall others having them as well. Adam -- "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -Hume To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message