From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 18 16:12:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C2A1065670; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:12:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.eu [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657F98FC2D; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:12:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-63-16.51-151.net24.it [151.51.16.63]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1IBogb3066642 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:50:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n1IBrcC9097445; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:53:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <499BF630.7080306@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:51:12 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <499551B9.7050805@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <499551B9.7050805@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 212.31.247.179 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:36:18 +0000 Cc: FreeBSD Current , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Major CAM performance regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:12:26 -0000 Scott Long ha scritto: Hello. > The following configurations are known to be affected: > > VMWare ESX > VMWare Fusion > (using bt or lsilogic controller options) > HP CISS RAID > Some MPT-SAS combinations with SATA drives attached > (Includes Dell SAS5/ir, but not PERC5/PERC6). Does it holds for any of these? Or do you require a combination of factors? I ask because I have two identical HP machines, one running 7.1p2/amd64, the other still at 7.1-PRERELEASE/amd64 and on both I get: # camcontrol tags da0 (pass1:ciss0:0:0:0): device openings: 254 So it looks like I'm not affected, although I have a ciss RAID. ??? bye & Thanks av.