From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 5 0:17:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A02837B400 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 00:17:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from room101.wuppy.net.ru (room101.WUPPY.NET.RU [212.30.191.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C773C43E4A for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 00:17:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from romanp@unshadow.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by room101.wuppy.net.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g757HXoI017783 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 11:17:33 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from romanp@unshadow.net) Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 11:17:33 +0400 (MSD) From: "Roman V. Palagin" To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: pppd 2.4.x Message-ID: <20020805110436.D315-100000@room101.wuppy.net.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! Why we not import pppd 2.4.x as NetBSD does? If the only reason is "nobody wann't do it" - I'll backport it from NetBSD. I don't like ppp (don't ask me why :) and I want IPv6 over pppX - so pppd 2.4.x is the only choice... - Roman --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message