From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 21:10:40 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7633416A417; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:10:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (pittgoth.com [205.134.163.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3547B13C458; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:10:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost.fbsdsecure.org (net-ix.gw.ai.net [205.134.160.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l7GLAdgK005891 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:10:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:10:11 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: danger@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20070816171011.199771da.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: <200708161204.l7GC4vVu071408@www.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: lme@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/115571: Use mount -t msdosfs instead of mount_msdosfs in thehandbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:10:40 -0000 On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:20:59 +0200 Daniel Ger=C5=BEo wrote: >=20 > Hello Lars, >=20 > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:04:57 GMT, Lars Engels wrote: > >=20 > >>Number: 115571 > >>Category: docs > >>Synopsis: Use mount -t msdosfs instead of mount_msdosfs in the >=20 > > On > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-trouble= .html > > could you please change mount_msdosfs to mount -t msdosfs? > > The former should no longe be executed manually. >=20 > May I ask you why do you suspect that mount_msdosfs should > not be user any more? In the future, all of the different mount_* utitilies should go bye bye. --=20 Tom Rhodes