From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 10 01:47:39 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DE0106564A;
	Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:47:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from astounding@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-yw0-f184.google.com (mail-yw0-f184.google.com
	[209.85.211.184])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCF18FC15;
	Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:47:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ywh14 with SMTP id 14so3969861ywh.15
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:47:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
	:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=S3ozbjz07tasdil1iuXcE/jt2IG8QSBCBzBgQM2QYsc=;
	b=hGfQLv5hrZtSE8gnRLYtgnofBbJREMTaXu7zWVyr4TchOw0sriF43rXZNuZ33+hdhI
	SDyLbGYPXAIgF64wo45N8IpgpbfzxGbwmM1YlymrDVp40NkHFD0T/ZIU+fRYVU3/rIj6
	AIkY+d58YT+GliDprJjPFpbNq+4smP1ZKVN5s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	b=A+HOLn+AcX7vrgSJTDOy8lNOHCbZaSa5FmiMpVymd5y4s4B3B9U9Gnkrh7TB92gsro
	q+htNfJcN6nUJGpGIyDxCony4HKafttUkmAo71LmTd4yEeg8EGCrq7qcqMX3Jp3lht9/
	uhpi5A4ZLyPv3GZUAAzCAyp2FYd4nIM8eFXwo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.179.30 with SMTP id g30mr343332anp.90.1268185658468; Tue, 
	09 Mar 2010 17:47:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e58000751003081753o1054d828i24a466e37aff7321@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201003090121.o291Lu17079143@www.freebsd.org>
	<201003090130.o291U0IX016619@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<e58000751003081753o1054d828i24a466e37aff7321@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:47:38 -0700
Message-ID: <e58000751003091747l4717d14en64f114e96a0e9721@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Aaron D. Gifford" <astounding@gmail.com>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/144568: Ruby 1.9.1 has rubygems version 1.3.1 built in,
	but 
	some gems require a newer version. 1.3.5 is available by the ports,
	but needs the following changes.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:47:39 -0000

Okay, that patch has a few typos...   i.e. RUBYS_VAR (wrong) instead
of RUBY_SVAR

Is defining another make variable like RUBY_SVAR the best way to make
sure that installed elements named after the installed version of Ruby
are correctly named?  i.e. gem18 or gem19 depending on whether
RUBY_VER is 1.8 or 1.9? Other suggestions?

Hoping Ruby 1.9.1 can be a first class citizen under FreeBSD soon,
Aaron out.