From owner-svn-src-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 13 22:04:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E62E40; Mon, 13 May 2013 22:04:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <51916292.4090002@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 18:00:50 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130408 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?VWxyaWNoIFNww7ZybGVpbg==?= , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-projects@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r250468 - projects/flex-sf/contrib/flex References: <201305101841.r4AIfEXw099976@svn.freebsd.org> <20130512154953.GS2055@acme.spoerlein.net> In-Reply-To: <20130512154953.GS2055@acme.spoerlein.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the src " projects" tree" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 22:04:13 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-05-12 11:49:53 -0400, Ulrich Sp￶rlein wrote: > On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 18:41:14 +0000, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> Author: jkim Date: Fri May 10 18:41:14 2013 New Revision: 250468 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/250468 >> >> Log: Fix some compiler warnings for Clang. >> >> Modified: projects/flex-sf/contrib/flex/buf.c >> projects/flex-sf/contrib/flex/filter.c >> projects/flex-sf/contrib/flex/flex.skl >> projects/flex-sf/contrib/flex/gen.c >> projects/flex-sf/contrib/flex/main.c >> projects/flex-sf/contrib/flex/misc.c > > Jung-uk, > > did you get these and the other changes/fixes upstreamed to the > project on SF? Would be nice to reduce needless diffs between the > projects. I can try but I was told that the upstream refused to accept patches like this in the past. In fact, DragonFlyBSD and NetBSD have their own local patches like this but never upstreamed for the reason: http://gitweb.dragonflybsd.org/dragonfly.git/commitdiff/655ed7a0 http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2013/04/06/msg042848.html Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRkWKSAAoJECXpabHZMqHO/NoIAIFnD9aqpvgkNt3w6jOd75Ih c30WWbrh+OJM9bQ9K9BwnRCHf6uQLP5UKiV2MJDvAvDfNaCuO0cx56cu++w13gMf BZOcjy253Xf6sLcOGpujIxBqZsKP2r2lhWdER95wOcmwdNoPoyH8CNfOh9kPHf1M 9C0XnEewKwXNo/LrFGoZAY/Y0Gsdxr4yAySSrKzR9tiOYzB9PMfhUzcdnnhgMUKb OX3QC0dJvfm6yq9OpNQ63YIpYgfUM4jSawynMnhIa3r+cSfzJpUcfslLpcoPJCey X1FnrBZ67aPnNDlu9WmZPIjQtg28MFNO4C2osE5hpZcx6oM/MKHuGCENGFcoYZo= =9jnO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----