From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Jan 12 15:21:12 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA02858
          for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 15:21:12 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from iworks.interworks.org (iworks.interworks.org [128.255.18.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA02853
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 15:21:10 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from deischen@iworks.interworks.org)
Received: (from deischen@localhost)
	by iworks.interworks.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA27570;
	Tue, 12 Jan 1999 17:21:32 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 17:21:32 -0600 (CST)
From: "Daniel M. Eischen" <deischen@iworks.interworks.org>
Message-Id: <199901122321.RAA27570@iworks.interworks.org>
To: marcus@miami.edu
Subject: Re: fetch in passive mode fails (repost)
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, junkmale@xtra.co.nz
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> I agree with your complaint...there should be one variable to control
> this.  But why haven't you filed a PR for this yourself?

As Dan Langille pointed out, there already is a PR for this (ports/5530).

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message