From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 10:20:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A23106566B; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:20:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C8E8FC1C; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id NAA07065; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:20:48 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E5F5C7F.6090109@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:20:47 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110705 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Andree References: <201108300823.p7U8NIfD038098@repoman.freebsd.org> <4E5D26E2.7040300@gmx.de> <201108301345.25661.beech@freebsd.org> <4E5E6A7E.3040606@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E5E6A7E.3040606@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Beech Rintoul , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/procmail Makefile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:20:51 -0000 on 31/08/2011 20:08 Matthias Andree said the following: > If everyone cared to read not just the past three posts but what was > written earlier in this whole thread, and ceased adding to the > meaningless "I've had no problems", that would help. > > Just because someone hasn't tripped over the bugs yet, is not a reason > to keep a port known to have massive bugs. It's like security bugs, > many people won't notice them and believe the software to be in proper > working order until after it's too late. > > There's a difference between "mature" and abandoned-and-known-buggy. > Not everything that hasn't changed in years is mature, there are a > number of projects that have simply died and not been picked up by > somebody else. Not everything that has bugs is useless. Not everything that appears to be abandoned is useless and can't/won't be picked up. If you don't want to use this port - fine. But let other people use it if they want. -- Andriy Gapon