From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 12 18:47:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from systemadmin.sheltonbbs.com (systemadmin.sheltonbbs.com [63.102.143.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8702E37B423 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 18:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.sheltonbbs.com [127.0.0.1]) by systemadmin.sheltonbbs.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA71692 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 20:47:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from butch@sheltonbbs.com) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 20:47:11 -0500 (CDT) From: Butch Evans X-Sender: root@systemadmin.sheltonbbs.com To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Telnet restrictions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I did not see anyone respond with xinetd. Is there something I should know? I know of the other packages, and have used both in different scenarios, but it seemed to me that the easiest and quickest way to do what he asked was xinetd. I know the other stuff offers many more options, making them more flexible, but if limiting the IP of the source is the main goal, then why not xinetd? I am not particularly PROMOTING xinetd, just wondering why I was the only one to MENTION it. -- Butch Evans Shelton Internet Network Admin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message