From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 18 23:05:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4F8135; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:05:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (mail-we0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D2F90A; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:05:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id t57so2914433wey.18 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:05:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7xeM830R16i/T8nFUHhI+w4MrKn2NzHHFKTB0X9nb6M=; b=QoGIVKen4eRY0fCk7/PBUy3mPV//1r+EYC9FHlgmPG1+k19HblabxRI3lP0u9sLAvS jIloUHf+i6B9qmZC0KMk+9iWGLUfSrJEegzKoelgRASakBRG+lUKD8qyFCnsZlhwi1e4 jtlU4vqaTujS3clt+vSqoud2SnP3CXNOvqqsMb0g3uBD/XaFgUH+18JtZY+l3xtRysq5 2wWzAMHUKvZpL/A1G34izKg1u1M2unrPbEYZ2PepXUcA0imjCvAK5/pBCT+zh2hnx+jj tXWmN62tjrYgZgCouO1ZCpkOinEmc/89YVG8lyy5UzgExSQAsgrdB/MlvgqKpg7slSPj nZwQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.73.173 with SMTP id m13mr21323640wiv.27.1366326325120; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:05:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.88.129 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:05:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1825476.qO1YuZaJ09@home.alkar.net> References: <51702dc6.87ee440a.57aa.327e@mx.google.com> <1436485.TxcZPeTyQ4@home.alkar.net> <1825476.qO1YuZaJ09@home.alkar.net> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:05:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623. From: Adrian Chadd To: Artyom Mirgorodskiy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 23:05:26 -0000 On 18 April 2013 15:54, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: > Nothing :( Ok, so I wonder now whether we're actually getting the right chainmask at startup. edit if_ath.c, look for 'ath_hal_getrxchainmask()' After the rx/tx chainmask is fetched,a dd this: device_printf(sc->sc_dev, "%s: RX chainmask=0x%x, TX chainmask=0x%x\n", sc->sc_rxchainmask, sc->sc_txchainmask); Adrian