From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 8 13:27:04 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA17451 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 8 May 1997 13:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA17446 for ; Thu, 8 May 1997 13:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA25464; Thu, 8 May 1997 13:20:01 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199705082020.NAA25464@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: FTP Performance To: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner) Date: Thu, 8 May 1997 13:20:01 -0700 (MST) Cc: tom@sdf.com, fenner@parc.xerox.com, smc@servtech.com, danny@panda.hilink.com.au, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <97May8.111829pdt.177486@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> from "Bill Fenner" at May 8, 97 11:18:22 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Tom Samplonius wrote: > > How would this misconfiguration occur? Just two routers with > >mis-matched MTU/MRU sizes? > > No, the only way for PMTU discovery to fail is for a router to not > return ICMP fragmentation required errors. I don't know how to > configure a router to do this, since it's required by RFC1812, > but perhaps there's a firewall in the way. Or a proxy server. It's impossible to legally proxy this as anything but unicast boradcasts, and it requires a *very* smart proxy, then, and it's still not RFC compilant. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.