From owner-freebsd-chat  Wed Jul  2 06:40:15 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA04337
          for chat-outgoing; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 06:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA04049
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 06:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (narvi@localhost)
          by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id QAA12897; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 16:32:52 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 16:32:52 +0300 (EEST)
From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
To: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@hwcn.org>
cc: Annelise Anderson <andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu>,
        Francisco Reyes <francisco@natserv.com>,
        FreeBSD Chat List <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Why Not Make tcsh the default shell?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970702081619.2652B-100000@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970702163103.12422A-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 2 Jul 1997, Tim Vanderhoek wrote:

> On Wed, 2 Jul 1997, Annelise Anderson wrote:
> 
> > However, new users do not know enough not to like the default; they do
> > not know that there is something better that is not entirely different
> > but merely enhanced; and they don't know enough to get whatever shell
> > they like. And in fact the process of adding a shell to /etc/shells,
> 
> Perhaps a list of ``reccomended packages''?
> 
> Hm.  I can just imagine the fight that the would start...  ;-)
> 

Fight? For what? Let's just have more than one of them. About 5 should be
about enough and still perhaps fit on the boot floppy.

	Sander

	There is no love, no good, no happiness and no future -
	all these are just illusions.

> 
> --
> Outnumbered?  Maybe.  Outspoken?  Never!
> tIM...HOEk
> 
>