From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Mar 19 21:40:14 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA05048
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 21:40:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from seagull.rtd.com (root@seagull.rtd.com [198.102.68.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA05041
          for <freebsd-ports@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 21:40:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dgy@localhost) by seagull.rtd.com (8.6.12/1.2) id WAA29487 for freebsd-ports@freefall.cdrom.com; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 22:40:04 -0700
From: Don Yuniskis <dgy@rtd.com>
Message-Id: <199603200540.WAA29487@seagull.rtd.com>
Subject: 2.1R sudo port
To: freebsd-ports@freefall.FreeBSD.org
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 22:40:04 -0700 (MST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Greetings!

I believe the sudo port distributed with 2.1R should build with
LDFLAGS = -static and OPTIONS = -DENV_EDITOR.  Admittedly, the
rationale for these choices is contradictory:
	-static prevents security breach by replacement of dynamic
	 libraries (though difficult)
	-ENV_EDITOR to be consistent with vipw(8)'s support of
	 $EDITOR (though this adds a security issue)
Thanx,
don