From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 23 13:04:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9809391; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:04:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839F325B8; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id QAA28461; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:04:32 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1VCr2V-000Pb1-Mk; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:04:31 +0300 Message-ID: <52175DA7.7030908@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:03:35 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130810 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Chisnall Subject: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <5CE4B5FA-9DA0-45E4-8D67-161E0829FE6B@FreeBSD.org> <52173C8D.20608@freebsd.org> <521754E6.3030906@FreeBSD.org> <422728FC-CE88-4AEF-AD10-3BF8910A2109@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <422728FC-CE88-4AEF-AD10-3BF8910A2109@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org, "re@FreeBSD.org Engineering Team" , current@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:04:34 -0000 on 23/08/2013 15:56 David Chisnall said the following: > So you don't want a working debugger? Our gdb doesn't work at all on MIPS > and barely works with code compiled with clang or a recent gcc. I am capable of using devel/gdb. Or do you mean kernel debugger? > We are > planning on importing LLDB soon (Ed Maste has been working on it, funded by > the FreeBSD Foundation), and it is a C++11 code base. It will not build with > our gcc or with our libstdc++ (and, in fact, since it uses the LLVM > libraries, will require LLVM in base to link libc++). There are multiple possible solutions to this issue. And note that I do support having clang in base and it being the default in head. > Or perhaps you don't care about flattened device trees. To be honest - no, I don't care about them. > The device tree > compiler that we have in base is written in C++ and contains numerous > occurrences of ugly code to make it work with old compilers. I will be very > happy to remove a load of hacks once C++11 support is available in the base > system (not for 10.0, as dtc is used on a lot of tier 2 archs where gcc is > still default). -- Andriy Gapon