From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Jul 2 06:41:28 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA04400 for chat-outgoing; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 06:41:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA04364 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 06:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (narvi@localhost) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id QAA12911; Wed, 2 Jul 1997 16:37:08 +0300 (EEST) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 16:37:08 +0300 (EEST) From: Narvi To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Annelise Anderson , Francisco Reyes , FreeBSD Chat List Subject: Re: Why Not Make tcsh the default shell? In-Reply-To: <22438.867842653@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 2 Jul 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > However, new users do not know enough not to like the default; they do > > not know that there is something better that is not entirely different > > but merely enhanced; and they don't know enough to get whatever shell > > That is not a failure of the distribution ideals (e.g. keep extras > like tcsh separate from the default bin dist) so much as it is a > failure of feature introduction. In other words, I could bring up > another dialog at some point in the installation / setup phase which > said "You probably won't like the default shells, so let me tell you > all about the extra, special fancy shells we also offer! [sales job > elided] So, which of these many attractive shells would you like me to > install for you today?" and the user would neither know nor care that > the shell came out of a package vs being bundled in by default. To > the user, how they get there is irrelevant just so long as the option > to install new features is provided in the appropriate context. > Well, so if I write a quick and dirty tcl/tk tutorial to the FreeBSD packages, I will not be shot on sight and someone will take a look at it? Sander There is no love, no good, no happiness and no future - all these are just illusions. > Of course, correctly determining such context and writing all the > "click the start menu at any time for new feature selection" user > hand-holding code which enumerates the options properly is something > which takes Real Work(tm), and it's rarely through lack of vision that > these sorts of mechanisms don't exist, but rather lack of time. :-( > > > telnet, getting the web server set up, trying to make the printer print, > > maybe worrying about dot clocks, ppp, reconfiguring the kernel to get > > the sound card working, etc. etc. etc., and is stuck with csh...because > > ........ > > No one has yet to adequately automate the procedure for getting > something better? :-) > > Jordan >