From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 21:27:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08242106564A for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:27:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan-freebsd-questions@ourbrains.org) Received: from ourbrains.org (li48-221.members.linode.com [66.246.76.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9657D8FC12 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan-freebsd-questions@ourbrains.org) Received: (qmail 20893 invoked by uid 1000); 2 Dec 2008 21:27:24 -0000 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:27:24 -0500 From: Dan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20081202212724.GB19886@ourbrains.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Subject: Re: Best Journaling File System - ZFS/??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:27:04 -0000 Don O'Neil(lists@lizardhill.com)@2008.12.02 08:57:58 -0800: > With all the discussions of ZFS lately, I'm beginning to wonder if it's > really ready for a production environment. Concerns over memory utilization, > speed, stability, etc... >From everything I've read people use it in production successfully, but not without some tweaking or testing. That said, I would love to see XFS ported. IIRC you can't resize gvinum volumes on the fly either, if that's the case, that would also be a nice feature. On Linux I can resize LVM volumes, and then resize a live XFS without having to unmount it. Takes seconds.