From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri May 31 23:34:20 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA11643
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 31 May 1996 23:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA11637
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 31 May 1996 23:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.5/8.6.9) id XAA12055; Fri, 31 May 1996 23:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 23:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199606010633.XAA12055@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua
CC: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, jkh@time.cdrom.com, ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199605301048.NAA17561@office.elvisti.kiev.ua> (stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua)
Subject: Re: Request for feedback:  REQUIRES_OS_VERSION feature.
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * 	What about bumping version number of -current to 3.0,
 * 	so this would seem more reasonable?
 * 
 * 
 * 	REQUIRES_OS_VERSION=    3.0    # ???

That's not our decision to make.  Ask DavidG. :)

Satoshi