From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 9 18:22:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0871816A400 for ; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 18:22:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.localelinks.com (web.localelinks.com [64.39.75.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EB343D48 for ; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 18:22:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (adsl-072-148-013-213.sip.jan.bellsouth.net [72.148.13.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.localelinks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD1F168; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 13:22:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id B18FE61C2B; Sun, 9 Apr 2006 13:22:54 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 13:22:54 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20060409182254.GL41551@over-yonder.net> References: <20060406192950.GE700@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20060408203233.K67402@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060408212421.GB720@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20060408160304.ek1xxodrkok4gw4g@webmail.1command.com> <44384EB8.8090803@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44384EB8.8090803@samsco.org> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11-fullermd.3 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "Chris H." Subject: Re: Pros and Cons of amd64 (versus i386). X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:22:59 -0000 On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 06:00:56PM -0600 I heard the voice of Scott Long, and lo! it spake thus: > > Modern disks (I don't know how to define a cutoff to this term, > unfortunately) definitely put more bits onto the outer rim of the > platter than the inner rim. Pretty much any disk you'd currently find, I'd say. diskinfo -t won't run through on my 4 or 2 gigs ("disk too small for test" :), but on my 9 gigger: Transfer rates: outside: 102400 kbytes in 5.215159 sec = 19635 kbytes/sec middle: 102400 kbytes in 6.268067 sec = 16337 kbytes/sec inside: 102400 kbytes in 8.237962 sec = 12430 kbytes/sec da4 at ahc2 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 da4: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da4: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 31, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da4: 8748MB (17916240 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1115C) -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.