From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun Nov  9 22:30:24 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA07160
          for chat-outgoing; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 22:30:24 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat)
Received: from cam.grad.kiev.ua ([195.5.25.54])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA07155
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 22:30:11 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from Ruslan@Shevchenko.kiev.ua)
Received: from Shevchenko.kiev.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cam.grad.kiev.ua (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA20222;
	Mon, 10 Nov 1997 09:24:50 GMT
Message-ID: <3466D2DF.D1703721@Shevchenko.kiev.ua>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 09:24:48 +0000
From: Ruslan Shevchenko <Ruslan@Shevchenko.kiev.ua>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03b8 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
CC: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Could FreeBSD be a viable platform for large SQL/SAP/etc 
	 enterprise applications?
References: <199711100605.WAA00544@rah.star-gate.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Amancio Hasty wrote:

> ? ?   for clients -- if you love Unix -- then Linux.
> ?
> ? I'd say you must be joking, but based on the accuracy of the rest of
> ? your response, this is perfectly in character.
> ?
>
> His posting was just flame bait .
>

  No, it is not flame.    It is real problem.


>         Cheers,
>         Amancio