From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Mar 23 21:26:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from kechara.flame.org (kechara.flame.org [204.152.184.79]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD63B1508C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:26:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sean@kechara.flame.org) Received: (qmail 14490 invoked from network); 24 Mar 1999 05:25:55 -0000 Received: from kechara.flame.org (204.152.184.79) by kechara.flame.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 1999 05:25:55 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by kechara.flame.org (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA14486 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:25:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:25:54 -0800 (PST) From: Sean-Paul Rees To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: 3.1-S and /lkm Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: kechara.flame.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I noticed that /lkm hasn't been touched since the day I installed FreeBSD 3.0-R. Since then, I've upgraded to 3.1-S, and was wondering if I still needed /lkm, over /modules. Would appreciate any input. Cheers, Sean To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message